Please See Important Disclaimer at the end of this Communication
Key Developments
- ATO ruling confirms no CGT payable on Brite Advisors’ fund liquidation for the 2025/26 financial year.
- Tax provision likely to drop from $175m AUD to $100m AUD, or potentially lower pending a second ruling expected in December.
- Interactive Brokers seeks to withhold $95m if receivers take legal action, delaying or diluting the interim distribution, but Receivers refute this
- Federal Court hearing set for 13 November 2025, with livestream access via the Court’s YouTube channel.
- Second Private Binding Ruling (PBR) submitted to the ATO, expected by 5 December 2025.
Trustees processing transfers: Alltrust SIPP, Pathlines SIPP, and STM Malta QROPS, along with several other SIPP and QROPS are the major Trustees, with differing reinvestment and transfer processes.
$175m AUD Tax Provision Likely to Drop to $100m – Or Lower
In the latest McGrathNicol update (6 November 2025), the Receivers confirmed that the Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has issued a Private Binding Ruling (PBR) in favour of their position — confirming no capital gains tax is payable on the liquidation and distribution of the Brite Advisors “Deficient Mixed Fund” for the 2025/26 financial year.
As a result, the Receivers have requested ATO approval to reduce the amount withheld for potential Australian tax liabilities from AUD $175 million down to AUD $100 million.
A second PBR, covering the remaining tax matters, was submitted on 6 November 2025. Depending on that ruling, the withholding could be cut even further before any interim distribution occurs.
Interactive Brokers’ $95 Million Claim
Alongside the ATO developments, the Receivers have confirmed that Interactive Brokers Australia (IBAU) has filed submissions with the Federal Court seeking to withhold approximately AUD $95 million from the interim distribution.
IBAU’s position is that this amount should be retained in case the Receivers pursue potential future legal action against the firm over Brite’s historical margin-loan arrangements and client losses.
The Receivers have formally opposed this request, arguing that the proposed $95m withholding is excessive and would unfairly reduce the funds available for beneficiaries in the interim distribution.
If the Court agrees with the Receivers, the $95m may be released into the wider distribution pool — a crucial outcome that could materially increase the percentage each trustee and member receives. However, if the Court sides with IBAU, the withheld amount could once again delay or dilute the initial payouts.
This issue will likely be addressed at the 13 November 2025 Federal Court hearing, which will be livestreamed on the Federal Court of Australia’s YouTube channel.
Our expectations are low that this request will be upheld, and it is likely to be dismissed by the Courts as it was by the Receivers.
What This Means for Brite Clients
For trustees and beneficiaries waiting for distributions, two key points stand out:
- More funds may become available for release if the ATO confirms the reduced withholding.
- Timing remains uncertain, as the Receivers are unlikely to finalise the distribution until both PBRs and consultations with the ATO are complete.
The Receivers aim for the ATO to issue its second ruling by 5 December 2025.
A Moving Target – Why the “$100m” May Not Be the Final Figure
The proposed $100m withholding is not yet confirmed. It’s a provisional figure, pending ATO review and Court approval.
The retained amount could still:
- Drop below $100m if further tax clarity emerges;
- Stay at $100m if the ATO prefers caution or takes longer than expected to provide a PBR; or
- Increase if any additional liabilities are identified, though this is unlikely.
Given these moving parts, clients should brace for further fluctuation in their projected entitlements as part of this initial interim distribution.
Cameron James – Supporting Brite Clients Through Trustee Changes
At Cameron James, we continue to assist Brite Advisors’ clients across all trustee structures — from UK-based SIPPs (Alltrust/PSG, Pathlines/L&C) to overseas schemes like STM Malta QROPS.
Our dedicated advisory team is already:
- Coordinating trustee transfers and new platform appointments for clients whose SIPP or QROPS is affected by the receivership.
- Reviewing interim distribution options to ensure that once payments are made, they can be quickly and compliantly reinvested.
- Working with existing and new Trustees (Praxis, AllTrust, Novia) to prepare compliant investment mandates and documentation ahead of the release of funds.
- Advising on alternative platforms and trustees, if applicable, where clients wish to consolidate or restructure for regulatory protection, cost efficiency, or US/EEA compliance.
- Providing holistic financial planning, focusing on life and assets outside the scope of the Brite Receivership.
Our goal is to ensure that when the interim distributions finally occur, clients are ready, their structures are compliant, and there’s no delay in getting funds reinvested safely and efficiently.
Trustee Changes: Why This Is a Strategic Step Now
One of the most important planning steps Brite clients can take now is assessing whether their current pension trustee remains appropriate — and whether a change (or partial change) may be beneficial given the receivership risk, fund flow timing, and personal reinvestment objectives.
QROPS Trustee Changes
For QROPS members, trustee change is often more flexible than with SIPPs.
Many QROPS wrappers are structured separately from the investment platform, meaning you can change the trustee without needing to move the underlying investments — reducing friction, cost, and delay.
At Cameron James, we have successfully completed QROPS-to-QROPS transfers, including for US-resident clients — a capability few advisory firms publicly exhibit or are authorised to undertake.
These changes can strengthen compliance, enhance reporting transparency, and ensure your QROPS remains aligned with UK and international tax rules, particularly under IRS foreign trust reporting and MiFID II.
Cameron James works alongside independent tax specialists to assess the cross-border implications, transfer timing, and regulatory due diligence required for each trustee move.
SIPP Trustee Changes
For SIPPs, the process can be more restrictive, however, changing trustees before the interim distribution can make administration smoother once funds are released — and may allow faster reinvestment once payments are confirmed.
Each case is unique. While certain workarounds exist, they can be complex and must be carefully structured with a regulated adviser to ensure both FCA and HMRC compliance.
Why Consider a Trustee Change Before the Interim Distribution
✔ Avoid delays by ensuring your trustee is already approved by the Court or Receivers.
✔ Improve clarity and oversight on your reinvestment strategy.
✔ Reduce latency between interim payout and reinvestment.
✔ Ensure compliance for US residents, EU nationals, or other non-UK tax residents under cross-border regulations.
How Cameron James Is Supporting Brite Clients
At Cameron James, our advisers have been supporting Brite clients since the earliest stages of the receivership — guiding investors through trustee reviews, documentation preparation, and cross-border reinvestment planning.
We help clients to:
✅ Review financial positions and deliver holistic, fee-based financial planning.
✅ Estimate Brite entitlements and likely interim distribution amounts.
✅ Advise on Trustee and Platform suitability and manage trustee-change submissions, where appropriate.
✅ Liaise directly with McGrathNicol and trustees to confirm payment details and account setup.
✅ Prepare reinvestment plans on FCA-regulated, fee-only platforms, where possible (e.g. Novia Global).
We operate with full regulatory oversight, no hidden commissions, and no product bias — ensuring each decision is driven purely by client outcomes and compliance integrity.
Next Steps
We’ll publish a further update following the 13 November court hearing and once the ATO provides its second PBR ruling.
For detailed updates, visit our blogs & YouTube Channel:
👉 cjfinance.co.uk/insights
👉 https://www.youtube.com/@cameronjamespensiontransfer
If you have an Alltrust, Pathlines, or STM Malta pension, or any other trustee with Brite platform assets and would like to discuss a transfer to a new trustee or platform, our cross-border advisers can guide you through every stage.
Key Takeaways
| Issue | Detail |
| PBR outcome | ATO confirms no CGT payable for 2025/26 deficient mixed fund liquidation |
| Tax withholding | Likely reduced from $175m → $100m and potentially further in December |
| Second Tax ruling | Expected by 5 Dec 2025 |
| Next Court hearing | 13 Nov 2025 – livestreamed |
| Impact | Larger distribution pool, possible delay |
| Why review trustees | Prepares clients for smoother interim distribution |
| Timing | Advised before interim payout to avoid administrative delays |
| CJ support | Trustee transitions, US/EEA-compliant investment, new platform advice, holistic financial planning, informed cross border tax focused approach with independent 3rd party tax advisors |
FAQs: Common Client Questions
Q1: How much will I receive in the interim distribution?
At present, there is too much uncertainty around the ATO tax rulings and the amount the Receivers will withhold to accurately predict final figures. Each case also varies based on valuation, prior withdrawals, and trustee structure.
Q2: Do I need to change my trustee?
Not necessarily, but reviewing your trustee may help safeguard your assets. Even if no change is needed, an independent review provides extra reassurance and documentation of suitability.
Q3: Will the tax position delay payout?
Possibly, but unlikely. The greater the amount the Receivers must retain for tax, the smaller and potentially slower the interim payout. However, with the second ATO PBR expected in early December 2025, this may be resolved before distributions begin.
Q4: Can a US resident change trustee for their QROPS or SIPP?
Yes, although complex, Cameron James is one of the few firms with trustee authorisation and regulatory coverage to manage QROPS-to-QROPS transfers for US residents under SEC.
Q5: When should I speak with an adviser?
Now. Ideally before the Payment Orders filing deadline of 18 December 2025, so that your trustee change or reinvestment plan can be processed in time for the interim payout.
Disclaimer
This communication is not intended for or directed to U.S.-connected persons. This communication should not be re-distributed or re-published without consent from Cameron James. Some of the content in this communication was provided by third parties of Cameron James. We have not independently verified every detail but believe the information to be reliable. None of this content should be construed as investment, legal, accounting, or tax advice.
Tax laws are complex and vary by individual. You should always seek advice from a qualified tax professional regarding your specific circumstances.